# Consciousness Council > Ejecuta una deliberación tipo Mind Council con múltiples perspectivas sobre cualquier pregunta, decisión o reto creativo, generando diversidad cognitiva real en vez de una única voz. Fuente: https://skillsagentes.com/skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/consciousness-council Markdown: https://skillsagentes.com/skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/consciousness-council.md Repositorio: https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills Autor: K-Dense-AI Licencia: MIT license Actualizado: el mes pasado Coste de contexto: 148 tok instalada, 2.2k tok al activarse, 3.5k tok con todos los archivos del bundle Bundle: 2 archivos, 14 KB Permisos que pide: read write ## Instalación Un skill son archivos markdown: los mismos archivos valen para cualquier agente y lo único que cambia es el directorio de destino, es decir la bandera `--agent`. Añade `-g` para instalarlo en todos los proyectos de la máquina. ```bash # Claude Code npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill consciousness-council --agent claude-code # Cursor npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill consciousness-council --agent cursor # Codex npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill consciousness-council --agent codex # Gemini CLI npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill consciousness-council --agent gemini # Windsurf npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill consciousness-council --agent windsurf # Cline npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill consciousness-council --agent cline ``` ## Qué hace - Ejecuta una deliberación estructurada tipo consejo con 4-6 arquetipos de pensamiento sobre cualquier pregunta o decisión - Obliga a que los miembros del consejo discrepen entre sí en algo sustantivo, evitando el consenso fácil - Sintetiza las posturas en puntos de convergencia, la tensión central, el punto ciego y una recomendación accionable - Permite configurar el consejo: modo rápido, profundo, anónimo, abogado del diablo o por rondas ## Cuándo usarla - El usuario quiere puntos de vista diversos o ayuda para tomar una decisión difícil - Se pide explícitamente un consejo, panel o debate tipo junta directiva - El usuario está atascado, dando vueltas, o su propio sesgo podría estar limitando su visión - Hay una disyuntiva o compromiso genuino con múltiples posturas válidas y sin respuesta obvia ## Cuándo no - La pregunta es puramente factual con una respuesta clara - El usuario ya decidió y solo busca validación ## Qué la activa - "Convoca un consejo mental sobre si debo dejar mi trabajo para emprender" - "Dame perspectivas opuestas sobre esta decisión de negocio" - "Modo consejo rápido sobre este dilema" - "Consejo profundo con abogado del diablo sobre esta estrategia" ## Archivos - SKILL.md — 9 KB - references/advanced-configurations.md — 5 KB ## SKILL.md Reproducido tal cual desde K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills bajo MIT license. Esta sección es el documento original y está en inglés. # Consciousness Council A structured multi-perspective deliberation system that generates genuine cognitive diversity on any question. Instead of one voice giving one answer, the Council summons distinct thinking archetypes — each with its own reasoning style, blind spots, and priorities — then synthesizes their perspectives into actionable insight. ## Why This Exists Single-perspective thinking has a ceiling. When you ask one mind for an answer, you get one frame. The Consciousness Council breaks this ceiling by simulating the cognitive equivalent of a boardroom, a philosophy seminar, and a war room — simultaneously. It's not roleplay. It's structured epistemic diversity. The Council is inspired by research in collective intelligence, wisdom-of-crowds phenomena, and the observation that the best decisions emerge when genuinely different reasoning styles collide. ## How It Works The Council has three phases: ### Phase 1 — Summon the Council Based on the user's question, select 4-6 Council Members from the archetypes below. Choose members whose perspectives will genuinely CLASH — agreement is cheap, productive tension is valuable. **The 12 Archetypes:** | # | Archetype | Thinking Style | Asks | Blind Spot | | --- | ------------------ | -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | | 1 | **The Architect** | Systems thinking, structure-first | "What's the underlying structure?" | Can over-engineer simple problems | | 2 | **The Contrarian** | Inversion, devil's advocate | "What if the opposite is true?" | Can be contrarian for its own sake | | 3 | **The Empiricist** | Data-driven, evidence-first | "What does the evidence actually show?" | Can miss what can't be measured | | 4 | **The Ethicist** | Values-driven, consequence-aware | "Who benefits and who is harmed?" | Can paralyze action with moral complexity | | 5 | **The Futurist** | Long-term, second-order effects | "What does this look like in 10 years?" | Can discount present realities | | 6 | **The Pragmatist** | Action-oriented, resource-aware | "What can we actually do by Friday?" | Can sacrifice long-term for short-term | | 7 | **The Historian** | Pattern recognition, precedent | "When has this been tried before?" | Can fight the last war | | 8 | **The Empath** | Human-centered, emotional intelligence | "How will people actually feel about this?" | Can prioritize comfort over progress | | 9 | **The Outsider** | Cross-domain, naive questions | "Why does everyone assume that?" | Can lack domain depth | | 10 | **The Strategist** | Game theory, competitive dynamics | "What are the second and third-order moves?" | Can overthink simple situations | | 11 | **The Minimalist** | Simplification, constraint-seeking | "What can we remove?" | Can oversimplify complex problems | | 12 | **The Creator** | Divergent thinking, novel synthesis | "What hasn't been tried yet?" | Can chase novelty over reliability | **Selection heuristic:** Match the question type to the most productive tension: - **Business decisions** → Strategist + Pragmatist + Ethicist + Futurist + Contrarian - **Technical architecture** → Architect + Minimalist + Empiricist + Outsider - **Personal dilemmas** → Empath + Contrarian + Futurist + Pragmatist - **Creative challenges** → Creator + Outsider + Historian + Minimalist - **Ethical questions** → Ethicist + Contrarian + Empiricist + Empath + Historian - **Strategy/competition** → Strategist + Historian + Futurist + Contrarian + Pragmatist These are starting points — adapt based on the specific question. The goal is productive disagreement, not consensus. ### Phase 2 — Deliberation Each Council Member delivers their perspective in this format: ``` 🎭 [ARCHETYPE NAME] Position: [One-sentence stance] Reasoning: [2-4 sentences explaining their logic from their specific lens] Key Risk They See: [The danger others might miss] Surprising Insight: [Something non-obvious that emerges from their frame] ``` **Critical rules for deliberation:** - Each member MUST disagree with at least one other member on something substantive. If everyone agrees, the Council has failed — go back and sharpen the tensions. - Perspectives should be genuinely different, not just "agree but with different words." - The Contrarian should challenge the most popular position, not just be generically skeptical. - Keep each member's contribution focused and sharp. Depth over breadth. ### Phase 3 — Synthesis After all members speak, deliver: ``` ⚖️ COUNCIL SYNTHESIS Points of Convergence: [Where 3+ members agreed — these are high-confidence signals] Core Tension: [The central disagreement that won't resolve easily — this IS the insight] The Blind Spot: [What NO member addressed — the question behind the question] Recommended Path: [Actionable recommendation that respects the tension rather than ignoring it] Confidence Level: [High / Medium / Low — based on how much convergence vs. divergence emerged] One Question to Sit With: [The question the user should keep thinking about after this session] ``` ## Council Configurations The user can customize the Council: - **"Quick council"** or **"fast deliberation"** → Use 3 members, shorter responses - **"Deep council"** or **"full deliberation"** → Use 6 members, extended reasoning - **"Add [archetype]"** → Include a specific archetype - **"Without [archetype]"** → Exclude a specific archetype - **"Custom council: [list]"** → User picks exact members - **"Anonymous council"** → Don't reveal which archetype is speaking until synthesis (reduces anchoring bias) - **"Devil's advocate mode"** → Every member must argue AGAINST whatever seems most intuitive - **"Rounds mode"** → After initial positions, members respond to each other for a second round ## What Makes a Good Council Question The Council works best on questions where: - There's genuine uncertainty or trade-offs - Multiple valid perspectives exist - The user is stuck or going in circles - The stakes are high enough to warrant multi-angle thinking - The user's own bias might be limiting their view The Council adds less value on: - Pure factual questions with clear answers - Questions where the user has already decided and just wants validation - Trivial choices with low stakes If the question seems too simple for a full Council, say so — and offer a quick 2-perspective contrast instead. ## Tone and Quality - Write each archetype's voice with enough distinctiveness that the user could identify them without labels. - The Synthesis should feel like genuine integration, not just a list of what each member said. - "Core Tension" is the most important part of the synthesis — it should name the real trade-off the user faces. - "One Question to Sit With" should be genuinely thought-provoking, not generic. - Never let the Council devolve into everyone agreeing politely. Productive friction is the point. ## Example **User:** "Should I quit my stable corporate job to start a company?" **Council Selection:** Pragmatist, Futurist, Empath, Contrarian, Strategist (5 members — high-stakes life decision with financial, emotional, and strategic dimensions) Then run the full 3-phase deliberation. ## Attribution Created by AHK Strategies — consciousness infrastructure for the age of AI. Learn more: https://ahkstrategies.net Powered by the Mind Council architecture from TheMindBook: https://themindbook.app ## Dónde encaja - Categoría: [Productividad](https://skillsagentes.com/categorias/productividad.md) — Planificación, toma de notas y automatización de flujos personales. - Creador: [K-Dense-AI](https://skillsagentes.com/creators/k-dense-ai.md) — 163 skills en el directorio - [Todas las skills](https://skillsagentes.com/skills.md) - [Ranking de instalaciones](https://skillsagentes.com/ranking.md) ## Otras skills del mismo repositorio - [Citation Management](https://skillsagentes.com/skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/citation-management.md): Gestión integral de citas académicas: busca en OpenAlex, PubMed y Google Scholar, extrae metadatos precisos, valida citas y genera entradas BibTeX correctamente formateadas. - [Scientific Slides](https://skillsagentes.com/skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/scientific-slides.md): Crea decks de diapositivas y presentaciones para charlas de investigación: PowerPoint, presentaciones de conferencia, seminarios, defensas de tesis. Da estructura, plantillas, guía de tiempos y validación visual. - [Literature Review](https://skillsagentes.com/skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/literature-review.md): Realiza revisiones bibliográficas sistemáticas y completas usando varias bases académicas (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar). Genera markdown y PDF con citas verificadas en varios estilos (APA, Nature, Vancouver). - [Infographics](https://skillsagentes.com/skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/infographics.md): Crea infografías profesionales con Nano Banana Pro AI y refinamiento iterativo inteligente. Usa Gemini 3.6 Flash para revisar la calidad e integra investigación con Perplexity Sonar. Soporta 10 tipos, 8 estilos y paletas para daltonismo. - [Latex Posters](https://skillsagentes.com/skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/latex-posters.md): Crea pósteres de investigación profesionales en LaTeX con beamerposter, tikzposter o baposter, para conferencias y comunicación científica: layout, colores, columnas múltiples e integración de figuras. --- Skills Agentes · [Índice de páginas en markdown](https://skillsagentes.com/sitemap.md) · [Inicio](https://skillsagentes.com/index.md)