# Review Agent Setup > Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates. Source: https://skillsagentes.com/skills/wshobson/agents/review-agent-setup Repository: https://github.com/wshobson/agents Author: wshobson License: MIT Updated: el mes pasado Context cost: 68 tok installed, 1.4k tok once triggered, 1.4k tok with every bundled file Bundle: 1 file, 5 KB Permissions requested: none declared ## Install ```bash npx -y skills add wshobson/agents --skill review-agent-setup --agent claude-code ``` ## What it does - Gatea acciones de revisión de agentes IA (reviews, comentarios, merges de PR, ediciones de CI) tras aprobación humana explícita - Genera un recibo firmado con Ed25519 por cada intento, aprobado o denegado - Aplica una política Cedar que deniega incondicionalmente las acciones de superficie de revisión salvo ventana de aprobación abierta - Ofrece comandos slash /approve-review y /list-pending para gestionar aprobaciones y ver denegaciones recientes - Permite verificar toda la cadena de recibos offline con npx @veritasacta/verify ## Use it when - El agente revisa, comenta o mergea pull requests con gh pr review/merge - El agente triagea issues, publica releases o modifica configuración de CI - El agente hace push a ramas protegidas (main, master, release, production) - El agente publica en superficies externas como webhooks de Slack o Discord ## Don't bother when - El agente solo edita archivos locales y ejecuta tests (usa protect-mcp en su lugar) ## What triggers it - "Configura aprobación humana antes de que el agente apruebe PRs" - "Necesito un registro auditable de las revisiones que hace mi agente" - "Quiero bloquear que el agente mergee a main sin mi visto bueno" ## Before you install - Requiere instalar el plugin review-agent-governance, copiar la política Cedar al proyecto y crear un directorio de recibos con clave de firma. - Needs on PATH: npx - Environment: TOOL_INPUT, TOOL_NAME ## Files - SKILL.md — 5 KB ## SKILL.md Reproduced verbatim from wshobson/agents under MIT. This section is the upstream document and is in English. # review-agent-governance — Setup Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt. ## When to use this plugin Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent: - Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (`gh pr review`, `gh pr merge`) - Triages issues (`gh issue comment`, `gh issue close`) - Publishes releases (`gh release create`) - Modifies CI configuration (`.github/workflows/`, `.gitlab-ci.yml`) - Pushes to protected branches (`main`, `master`, `release`, `production`) - Posts to external notification surfaces (Slack webhooks, Discord) If the agent is only doing local file edits and running tests, this plugin is overkill. Use `protect-mcp` for general tool-call policy enforcement and skip this one. ## One-time setup ### 1. Install the plugin ```bash claude plugin install wshobson/agents/review-agent-governance ``` ### 2. Copy the default policy to your project ```bash cp .claude/plugins/review-agent-governance/policies/review-agent-governance.cedar \ ./review-governance.cedar ``` You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See `../agents/review-policy-author.md` for guidance on authoring review policies. ### 3. Create a receipts directory and sign key ```bash mkdir -p ./review-receipts echo "./review-receipts/" >> .gitignore echo "./review-governance.key" >> .gitignore echo "./.review-approved" >> .gitignore ``` The first invocation of `protect-mcp sign` will create the key. Commit the public key from the first receipt so auditors can verify later. ## Per-session workflow The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after. ### Flag file (simplest) ```bash # Before the action you want to approve touch ./.review-approved # Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge # Immediately after rm ./.review-approved ``` ### Slash command (from within Claude Code) ``` /approve-review "Reviewing PR #123 authored by contributor X" ``` This creates `./.review-approved` with the given reason embedded as a note, and writes a human-approved receipt to the chain. A follow-up `rm` is still needed to close the window. ### Dry-run everything (force full policy evaluation) If you want every tool call to go through Cedar with no approval bypass: ```bash export REVIEW_APPROVAL_FLAG=./.never-approve ``` Any tool call matching a forbid rule will be denied; approved windows have no effect. Useful for CI or for a locked-down audit run. ## Verifying the chain List all receipts: ```bash ls -la ./review-receipts/ ``` Verify the entire chain offline: ```bash npx @veritasacta/verify ./review-receipts/*.json ``` Exit 0 means every receipt is authentic and the chain is intact. Exit 1 means one receipt has been tampered with. Exit 2 means a receipt is malformed. Look at recent denials: ``` /list-pending ``` Within Claude Code this slash command walks the receipt chain and prints any recent `decision: deny` entries with the tool name, command pattern, and timestamp. ## Example: approving a PR review ```bash # 1. Human reviews the agent's proposed comment $ /list-pending Recent denials: - 2026-04-17T14:23:01Z Bash "gh pr review 42 --approve --body 'LGTM'" - 2026-04-17T14:23:02Z Bash "gh pr comment 42 --body 'Looking good'" # 2. Human decides the first one is appropriate, approves it $ /approve-review "Approving LGTM on PR 42 after visual inspection" ./.review-approved created # 3. Agent retries the action; this time it succeeds $ agent: gh pr review 42 --approve --body "LGTM" [receipt: rec_XXX, decision=allow, reason=human_approved] # 4. Human closes the window $ rm ./.review-approved ``` Every step is in the receipt chain. The chain is offline-verifiable for regulators, counterparties, or downstream auditors who want to confirm that no review action bypassed the human gate. ## Composing with protect-mcp If both plugins are installed, run them side by side: ```json { "hooks": { "PreToolUse": [ { "matcher": ".*", "hooks": [ { "type": "command", "command": "npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 evaluate --policy ./protect.cedar --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" --fail-on-missing-policy false" } ] }, { "matcher": ".*", "hooks": [ { "type": "command", "command": "if [ -f ./.review-approved ]; then exit 0; fi; npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 evaluate --policy ./review-governance.cedar --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" --fail-on-missing-policy false" } ] } ] } } ``` Both hooks must pass for the tool call to proceed. Cedar deny in either policy blocks it. ## Standards - **Ed25519** — RFC 8032 (digital signatures) - **JCS** — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization) - **Cedar** — AWS's open authorization policy language - **IETF draft** — [draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts/) --- Skills Agentes — https://skillsagentes.com/skills/wshobson/agents/review-agent-setup