Skills Agentes

Hugging Science

Para IA/ML en dominios científicos (biología, química, física, genómica, clima, materiales...). Catálogo curado de datasets, modelos, posts y Spaces de Hugging Science, accesible vía `datasets`, `transformers` y `gradio_client`.

Estrellas
34.8k

en todo el repo

Actividad
59

0–100, la ruta de este skill

Actualizado
el mes pasado

último commit aquí

Commits
4

últimos 90 días

Contexto
2.5k tok

132 tok en reposo

Paquete
7 archivos

47 KB

Instalar

Funciona con cualquier agente que lea SKILL.md

npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill hugging-science --agent claude-code

Se instala solo en este repositorio.

Este skill makes network requests.

Qué hace

  • Mapea la tarea del usuario a uno de los 17 dominios científicos del catálogo de Hugging Science
  • Obtiene el contenido del catálogo (`llms.txt`, `topics/<slug>.md`) con `scripts/fetch_catalog.py`
  • Recomienda datasets, modelos o Spaces científicos pre-filtrados por calidad y apertura
  • Usa las APIs estándar de Hugging Face (`datasets`, `transformers`, Inference API, `gradio_client`) para consumir los recursos
  • Cita el blog de metodología del recurso elegido cuando existe

Úsalo cuando

  • La tarea del usuario aplica IA/ML a un dominio científico (proteínas, genomas, moléculas, clima, galaxias...)
  • Preguntan si existe un dataset o modelo para un problema científico concreto
  • Quieren afinar o evaluar sobre datos científicos, o reproducir un paper de ML científico
  • Necesitan una demo interactiva para una tarea científica (diseño de binders, prueba de teoremas...)

No lo uses cuando

  • La tarea es ML genérico no científico (sistemas de recomendación, chatbots RAG, visión con gatos y perros)

Qué lo activa

Di cualquiera de estas frases y el agente debería cargar este skill.

  • ¿Hay algún dataset de proteínas para este experimento?
  • Busca modelos científicos de Hugging Science para genómica
  • Necesito una demo interactiva de diseño de binders

SKILL.md

En inglés

Hugging Science

Hugging Science is a curated, LLM-friendly index of scientific datasets, models, blog posts, and interactive demos for ML researchers. Use it when a scientific ML question lands in front of you — it's much higher signal than generic search and the entries are pre-filtered for quality and openness.

There are two related surfaces, and you should use both:

  • The catalog at huggingscience.co — a static, parseable index of resources across 17 scientific domains. It exposes llms.txt (compact), llms-full.txt (full content), and topics/<slug>.md (per-domain). These are markdown files designed to be fetched and read.
  • The hugging-science Hugging Face organizationhuggingface.co/hugging-science — community-submitted datasets, a few models, and ~27 interactive Spaces (notably BoltzGen for protein/binder design, Dataset Quest for submissions, and Science Release Heatmap for ecosystem visualization).

The catalog points to resources hosted on the broader Hugging Face Hub. So an entry like arcinstitute/opengenome2 is a regular HF dataset that you load with the datasets library; an entry like facebook/esm2_t33_650M_UR50D is a regular HF model you load with transformers. The catalog's job is curation and discovery; usage goes through standard Hugging Face APIs.

When to use this skill

Engage this skill when the user's task involves AI/ML applied to science. Common signals:

  • Names a scientific domain (protein, genome, molecule, crystal, weather, climate, galaxy, EEG, microbiome, pathology, plasma, …)
  • Asks "is there a dataset/model for X" where X is scientific
  • Wants to fine-tune on scientific data, evaluate on scientific benchmarks, or reproduce a scientific ML paper
  • Asks about specific known scientific models (Evo-2, ESM2, BoltzGen, Nucleotide Transformer, AlphaFold-derived, etc.)
  • Needs an interactive demo for a scientific task (binder design, theorem proving, etc.)

If the task is generic ML (recommendation systems, chatbot RAG, vision on cats and dogs), this skill is not the right tool — defer to general HF Hub knowledge instead.

Core workflow

Most invocations follow this five-step loop. Don't skip discovery — the value of Hugging Science is that it has already filtered hundreds of resources down to high-signal picks per domain.

1. Identify the domain(s)

Map the user's task to one or more of the 17 topic slugs:

astronomy · benchmark · biology · biotechnology · chemistry · climate · conservation · earth-science · ecology · energy · engineering · genomics · materials-science · mathematics · medicine · physics · scientific-reasoning

Some tasks span multiple topics (e.g., drug discovery → chemistry + biology + medicine). Fetch each relevant topic.

2. Fetch the relevant catalog content

Use the bundled script for clean, structured access:

python scripts/fetch_catalog.py topic biology
python scripts/fetch_catalog.py topic materials-science --filter models
python scripts/fetch_catalog.py search "protein language model"
python scripts/fetch_catalog.py all     # full llms-full.txt

You can also fetch the raw markdown directly:

  • https://huggingscience.co/llms.txt — compact index
  • https://huggingscience.co/llms-full.txt — every entry, every domain
  • https://huggingscience.co/topics/<slug>.md — one domain (slug is hyphenated, e.g. materials-science.md, earth-science.md, scientific-reasoning.md)

Each entry is a markdown block with Type, Tags, HuggingFace URL (or Link for blogs), and a one-line description. See references/topics-and-slugs.md for the entry schema and slug list.

3. Pick the right resource(s)

Read the descriptions and tags. Match to the user's task with judgment, not keyword overlap. Things to weigh:

  • Scale fit — Evo-2 40B is overkill for a quick sequence classification on a laptop; ESM2 35M might be perfect.
  • License and access — most are open, but check the underlying HF model card.
  • Modality alignment — DNA vs. protein vs. SMILES vs. crystal structure; many "biology" models are not interchangeable.
  • Recency / supersession — if both an older and newer entry cover the same task, prefer newer unless there's a reason not to.

If you're not sure which resource to pick, briefly present the top 2–3 candidates to the user with their tradeoffs, then proceed once they choose. Don't pick silently when the choice materially changes the work.

For domain-specific go-to picks (the "if in doubt, start here" entries), see references/flagship-resources.md.

4. Use the resource

The mechanics depend on resource type. Read the matching reference file before writing code:

  • Datasetsreferences/using-datasets.md — loading via datasets, streaming for huge corpora, common columns, splits
  • Modelsreferences/using-models.md — local transformers, Hugging Face Inference API, Inference Providers for very large models, GPU sizing
  • Spaces (interactive demos)references/using-spaces.mdgradio_client pattern with a worked BoltzGen example

The reference files are short and focused. If you're already fluent in the relevant API, skim; if not, read fully before writing code. The patterns are different from generic HF usage in a few important places (e.g., trust_remote_code requirements, scientific-data dtype gotchas).

5. Cite the methodology

When the catalog has a blog post matching the task (Type: blog or in the Blog Posts section of a topic file), include its URL when you explain your approach to the user. Methodology blogs are written by the dataset/model authors and answer "why this design" questions that model cards usually skip. Treat them like citations — a one-line "see for the methodology behind X" is plenty.

Authentication: HF_TOKEN

Many catalog resources are gated (clinical data, large foundation models, private Spaces). Authenticate via the HF_TOKEN environment variable.

Load HF_TOKEN from a .env file when available — that's where the user keeps secrets. Use python-dotenv at the top of any script that hits the HF API:

from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()    # picks up HF_TOKEN from .env in cwd or any parent dir

If .env doesn't exist or doesn't define HF_TOKEN, fall back gracefully — many resources are public and work without it. Don't hard-code tokens, don't echo them, and don't suggest huggingface-cli login as the primary path; the user prefers .env.

The .env file should contain a line like:

HF_TOKEN=hf_...

If you're creating a new project, also add .env to .gitignore if it isn't already there.

A few important things to remember

The catalog is curated, not exhaustive. If a user needs a specific resource and Hugging Science doesn't list it, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist on HF Hub. Search HF Hub directly as a fallback. But always start with the catalog when the domain matches — the curation is the value.

The entries are pointers. Don't try to "use Hugging Science" as if it were an API. There is no Hugging Science inference endpoint. Every actionable resource lives on HF Hub or as a HF Space, and you use it via the standard HF tooling.

Many scientific models require trust_remote_code=True. Custom architectures (Evo-2, many genomics/materials models) ship custom modeling code. This is normal in this ecosystem, but the flag executes arbitrary Python from the model repo on the user's machine — so ask the user before you set it, naming the repo, and wait for an answer. Appearing in the catalog is not a vetting signal: entries are pointers fetched over the network, not code review. The same applies to sending files or tokens to a Space via gradio_client.

Scientific datasets are often large and weirdly-shaped. Genomics corpora can be billions of tokens; cosmology images can be hundreds of GB; materials datasets contain non-standard objects (crystal structures, graphs). Use streaming (streaming=True on load_dataset) by default for anything claimed to be over a few GB, and inspect schema before assuming columns.

Spaces are great for one-off scientific generations. If the user wants to design a binder for a target protein or run inference on a hosted model demo, calling the Space via gradio_client is faster and cheaper than spinning up the model locally. Check references/using-spaces.md first — huggingface.co/hugging-science has ~27 of these.

The catalog itself may evolve. Entries get added regularly; occasionally entries change slugs. If a URL 404s, refetch the topic file or llms.txt to get the current state — don't paper over the failure.

Bundled resources

  • scripts/fetch_catalog.py — fetch and filter catalog content. Run with --help for full usage. Use this in preference to ad-hoc WebFetch calls when you need structured access.
  • references/topics-and-slugs.md — exact topic slugs, what each covers, and the entry schema.
  • references/using-datasets.md — patterns and gotchas for loading scientific datasets.
  • references/using-models.md — running scientific models locally, via Inference API, or via Inference Providers.
  • references/using-spaces.md — calling HF Spaces (notably BoltzGen) programmatically with gradio_client.
  • references/flagship-resources.md — go-to dataset/model picks per domain when the user wants a sensible default.

Reproducido de K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills bajo licencia MIT. Leer esta página en markdown.

Archivos

7 archivos en el paquete. Solo se lee SKILL.md al activarse — las referencias se cargan si el skill decide que las necesita.

Antes de instalar

Muchos recursos del catálogo requieren autenticación vía la variable `HF_TOKEN`, preferiblemente cargada desde un archivo `.env`.

Necesita en el PATH:python

Detalles

Creador
K-Dense-AI
Categoría
Investigación
Licencia
MIT
Recursos incluidos
scripts en python + referencias
Código fuente
Ver SKILL.md

Etiquetas

Más de K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

Este repo incluye 163 skills. Si instalas uno, normalmente ya tienes los demás.

Gestión integral de citas académicas: busca en OpenAlex, PubMed y Google Scholar, extrae metadatos precisos, valida citas y genera entradas BibTeX correctamente formateadas.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.7k tok
Tamaño del paquete
21 archivos
Última actualización
hace 28 días
investigacion

Realiza revisiones bibliográficas sistemáticas y completas usando varias bases académicas (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar). Genera markdown y PDF con citas verificadas en varios estilos (APA, Nature, Vancouver).

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.2k tok
Tamaño del paquete
12 archivos
Última actualización
hace 15 días
investigacion

Crea decks de diapositivas y presentaciones para charlas de investigación: PowerPoint, presentaciones de conferencia, seminarios, defensas de tesis. Da estructura, plantillas, guía de tiempos y validación visual.

Costo de contexto al activarse
5.1k tok
Tamaño del paquete
24 archivos
Última actualización
hace 15 días
documentos

Crea infografías profesionales con Nano Banana Pro AI y refinamiento iterativo inteligente. Usa Gemini 3.6 Flash para revisar la calidad e integra investigación con Perplexity Sonar. Soporta 10 tipos, 8 estilos y paletas para daltonismo.

Costo de contexto al activarse
2.7k tok
Tamaño del paquete
8 archivos
Última actualización
hace 15 días
diseno ui

Crea pósteres de investigación profesionales en LaTeX con beamerposter, tikzposter o baposter, para conferencias y comunicación científica: layout, colores, columnas múltiples e integración de figuras.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.9k tok
Tamaño del paquete
17 archivos
Última actualización
hace 15 días
documentos

Crea diagramas científicos de calidad de publicación con la IA Nano Banana 2 y refinamiento iterativo inteligente. Gemini 3.6 Flash revisa la calidad y solo regenera si está por debajo del umbral de tu tipo de documento.

Costo de contexto al activarse
4.1k tok
Tamaño del paquete
6 archivos
Última actualización
hace 15 días
diseno ui

Skills relacionados

Astropy

34.8k

Librería Python central para astronomía y astrofísica: unidades/cantidades, coordenadas, E/S de FITS, tablas, sistemas de tiempo, WCS y cosmología, para implementar o depurar código con Astropy.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.6k tok
Tamaño del paquete
8 archivos
Última actualización
el mes pasado
investigacion

Integración con el SDK de Python de Benchling y su API REST para entidades del registro, inventario, entradas del cuaderno electrónico (ELN), workflows, Benchling Apps y consultas al Data Warehouse.

Costo de contexto al activarse
1.9k tok
Tamaño del paquete
6 archivos
Última actualización
el mes pasado
investigacion

Busca papers científicos y obtiene datos experimentales estructurados extraídos de estudios a texto completo vía el servidor MCP de BGPT: más de 25 campos por paper (métodos, resultados, muestras, calidad, conclusiones).

Costo de contexto al activarse
713 tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
el mes pasado
investigacion