Skills Agentes

Observability And Instrumentation

Instrumenta el código para que el comportamiento en producción sea visible y diagnosticable. Úsalo al añadir logs, métricas, trazas o alertas, al lanzar algo a producción, o cuando hay problemas y no se sabe qué pasó.

Estrellas
97.9k

en todo el repo

Actividad
64

0–100, la ruta de este skill

Actualizado
hace 22 días

último commit aquí

Commits
5

últimos 90 días

Contexto
3.5k tok

77 tok en reposo

Paquete
1 archivo

14 KB

Instalar

Funciona con cualquier agente que lea SKILL.md

npx -y skills add addyosmani/agent-skills --skill observability-and-instrumentation --agent claude-code

Se instala solo en este repositorio.

Este skill reads environment config.

Qué hace

  • Instrumenta el código con logs estructurados, métricas y trazas para que el comportamiento en producción sea visible y diagnosticable
  • Exige definir antes de instrumentar qué preguntas se hará el ingeniero de guardia, para que cada señal responda a una de ellas
  • Aplica RED (Rate, Errors, Duration) en cada endpoint y dependencia externa, y USE (Utilization, Saturation, Errors) en recursos como colas y pools
  • Exige IDs de correlación en cada línea de log y span, y un campo que identifique el punto de entrada cuando varias fuentes escriben en el mismo log
  • Define reglas para las alertas: deben basarse en síntomas que sufre el usuario, ser accionables y enlazar a un runbook

Úsalo cuando

  • Al construir cualquier funcionalidad que va a correr en producción
  • Al añadir un nuevo servicio, endpoint, trabajo en segundo plano o integración externa
  • Cuando un incidente de producción tardó demasiado en diagnosticarse porque no se sabía qué había pasado
  • Al configurar o revisar reglas de alerta, o al revisar un PR que añade I/O, reintentos, colas o llamadas entre servicios

No lo uses cuando

  • Para diagnosticar un fallo que está ocurriendo ahora mismo: el archivo remite a la skill debugging-and-error-recovery
  • Para perfilar y optimizar lentitud ya medida: el archivo remite a la skill performance-optimization
  • Para checklists de monitorización del día de lanzamiento: el archivo remite a la skill shipping-and-launch

Qué lo activa

Di cualquiera de estas frases y el agente debería cargar este skill.

  • “Instrumenta este endpoint con logs, métricas y trazas”
  • “Añade un ID de correlación a las peticiones”
  • “Revisa las reglas de alerta de este servicio”
  • “¿Por qué no pudimos diagnosticar este incidente con los logs actuales?”

SKILL.md

En inglés

Observability and Instrumentation

Overview

Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.

When to Use

  • Building any feature that will run in production
  • Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
  • A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened")
  • Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
  • Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls

NOT for:

  • Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the debugging-and-error-recovery skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time)
  • Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the performance-optimization skill
  • Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the shipping-and-launch skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them

Process

1. Define "working" before instrumenting

Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:

FEATURE: checkout payment retry
QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?)
3. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.

If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.

2. Pick the right signal for each question

Signal Answers Cost profile Example
Structured log "What happened in this specific case?" Per-event; grows with traffic payment_failed with provider error code
Metric "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" Fixed per series; cheap to query p99 latency of provider calls
Trace "Where did time go across services?" Per-request; usually sampled One slow checkout, broken down by hop

Rule of thumb: metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why.

3. Structured logging

Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:

// BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent
logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);

// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields
logger.warn({
  event: 'payment_failed',
  paymentId: id,
  provider: 'stripe',
  errorCode: err.code,
  attempt: n,
}, 'payment failed');

Log levels — use them consistently:

Level Meaning On-call action
error Invariant broken; someone may need to act Investigate
warn Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) Watch for trends
info Significant business event (order placed, job finished) None
debug Diagnostic detail Off in production by default

Correlation IDs are mandatory. Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:

// Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream
app.use((req, res, next) => {
  req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID();
  req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id });
  res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id);
  next();
});

When several entry points write to one log, name the entry point. A correlation ID identifies a run; it does not say which code path started it. The same job reached by a scheduler, by a replay endpoint, and by a manual CLI run produces interchangeable lines in one sink, so attributing a line falls back to elimination — cross-reading the scheduler's history, the process table, a deploy log — and that argument holds only as long as those external records happen to still exist. Stamp the entry point where the run starts, next to the correlation ID, and propagate both the same way:

// One helper for every entry point: the run's own logger carries both fields.
// `entryPoint`, not `source` — ECS reserves `source.*` for network fields.
export const runLog = (entryPoint: 'scheduler' | 'replay_endpoint' | 'cli', runId: string) =>
  logger.child({ entryPoint, requestId: runId });

// scheduler tick        -> runLog('scheduler', crypto.randomUUID())
// POST /jobs/:id/replay -> runLog('replay_endpoint', req.id)
// CLI invocation        -> runLog('cli', process.env.RUN_ID ?? crypto.randomUUID())

Both fields have to cross the same boundaries as the correlation ID — queue metadata, HTTP headers — or a worker re-derives the entry point and guesses. A field that merely correlates with an entry point is a hint, not an attribution: anything that can invoke the job can reproduce it.

Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII. This is a hard rule from the security-and-hardening skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.

4. Metrics

For request-driven services, instrument RED on every endpoint and every external dependency: Rate (requests/sec), Errors (failure rate), Duration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use USE: Utilization, Saturation, Errors.

As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' prom-client — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.

import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';

const httpDuration = new Histogram({
  name: 'http_request_duration_seconds',
  help: 'HTTP request duration',
  labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'],  // '2xx', not '200'
  buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5],
});

Cardinality is the failure mode. Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.

OK as label:    route="/api/tasks/:id"   status_class="5xx"   provider="stripe"
NEVER a label:  user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text

Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.

5. Distributed tracing

Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:

// tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else
import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';

const sdk = new NodeSDK({
  serviceName: 'checkout-service',
  instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
});
sdk.start();

Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., applyDiscounts, chargeProvider) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.

6. Alerting

Alert on symptoms users feel, not on causes:

SYMPTOM (page-worthy):           CAUSE (dashboard, not a page):
error rate > 1% for 5 min        CPU at 85%
p99 latency > 2s                 one pod restarted
queue age > 10 min               disk at 70%

Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.

Rules for every alert you create:

  1. It must be actionable. If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
  2. It links to a runbook — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path.
  3. It has a threshold and duration justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess.
  4. Use two severities only: page (user-facing, act now) and ticket (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.

Writing Runbooks

Rule 2 above requires every alert to link to a runbook. A runbook's job is to answer three questions without requiring the reader to think: what is happening, what to check first, and who to call if that doesn't resolve it. Store in docs/runbooks/ named after the alert.

Minimum viable runbook (three lines):

# Runbook: High Error Rate on /api/tasks
**Means:** DB connection pool likely exhausted, or a bad deploy.
**First check:** `SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE backend_type = 'client backend';`
  — if count > pool limit, see Step 2. (Swap in the equivalent for your database.)
**Escalate to:** #db-oncall or engineering on-call rotation.

When to expand beyond three lines: add steps only when the first check alone isn't enough to decide. A five-step runbook that covers the three most common causes is better than a twenty-step document that covers every edge case and gets skimmed.

Keep runbooks current. Update the runbook as part of closing every incident it was used in — a stale runbook builds false confidence. If a step was wrong or missing, fix it before marking the incident resolved.

7. Verify the telemetry itself

Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:

  • Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by requestId, confirm fields are structured (not [object Object])
  • Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values
  • Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
  • Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works

Common Rationalizations

Rationalization Reality
"I'll add logging after it works" "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build.
"More logs = more observability" Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines.
"console.log is fine for now" Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once.
"We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions.
"Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does.
"User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces.
"Tracing is overkill for our two services" Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial.

Red Flags

  • A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry
  • Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields
  • No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan
  • One log stream fed by a scheduler, a webhook, and manual runs, with no field naming which one produced the line
  • Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb)
  • Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles
  • Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action
  • Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored
  • Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs
  • "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy

Verification

After instrumenting a feature, confirm:

  • The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one
  • All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line
  • Every log sink written by more than one entry point carries an entry-point field, set where the run starts and propagated with the correlation ID rather than inferred downstream
  • No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output)
  • RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets
  • Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable
  • A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans
  • Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once
  • An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source

For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see ../../references/observability-checklist.md.

Reproducido de addyosmani/agent-skills bajo licencia MIT. Leer esta página en markdown.

Archivos

1 archivo en el paquete. Solo se lee SKILL.md al activarse — las referencias se cargan si el skill decide que las necesita.

Antes de instalar

Variables de entorno:RUN_ID

Detalles

Creador
addyosmani
Licencia
MIT
Recursos incluidos
Solo SKILL.md
Código fuente
Ver SKILL.md

Etiquetas

Más de addyosmani/agent-skills

Este repo incluye 25 skills. Si instalas uno, normalmente ya tienes los demás. Ver el pack agent-skills entero y su comando de instalación

Crea especificaciones antes de programar: al empezar un proyecto o cambio significativo sin spec, al redactar un PRD con objetivos y alcance, o cuando un requisito agrupa varias capacidades testeables que exigen un mapa de módulos.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.1k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
hace 18 días
herramientas desarrollo

Optimiza la configuración del contexto del agente. Úsalo al iniciar una sesión nueva, cuando la calidad del agente empeora, al cambiar de tarea o al configurar archivos de reglas y contexto de un proyecto.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.9k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
hace 23 días
herramientas desarrollo

Optimiza el rendimiento de la aplicación en frontend, backend, consultas y bases de datos. Úsalo cuando hay requisitos de rendimiento, se sospecha una regresión, hace falta mejorar Core Web Vitals o el profiling revela cuellos de botella.

Costo de contexto al activarse
5.4k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
el mes pasado
herramientas desarrollo

Divide el trabajo en tareas ordenadas. Úsalo cuando hay un spec que hace falta trocear en tareas implementables, cuando una tarea parece demasiado grande, para estimar alcance, o cuando es posible trabajar en paralelo.

Costo de contexto al activarse
2.6k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
el mes pasado
herramientas desarrollo

Refuerza el código frente a vulnerabilidades: entradas de usuario, autenticación, almacenamiento de datos, integraciones externas, el OWASP Top Ten, auditoría de dependencias y cumplimiento de privacidad (GDPR, CCPA).

Costo de contexto al activarse
7k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
hace 2 meses
seguridad

Realiza revisión de código en múltiples ejes. Úsalo antes de fusionar cualquier cambio, sea escrito por ti, otro agente o una persona, para evaluar la calidad antes de entrar a la rama principal.

Costo de contexto al activarse
5.1k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
el mes pasado
productividad

Skills relacionados

Prepara lanzamientos a producción: qué debe estar listo antes de desplegar, checklist de prelanzamiento, configuración de monitorización, rollout escalonado y estrategia de rollback.

Costo de contexto al activarse
2.9k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
hace 2 meses
devops infraestructura

Guía para diseñar APIs e interfaces estables. Úsalo al diseñar APIs, límites entre módulos, endpoints REST o GraphQL, o contratos de tipos entre frontend y backend.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.7k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
el mes pasado
productividad

Prueba en navegadores reales usando Chrome DevTools MCP. Úsalo al construir o depurar cualquier cosa que corra en un navegador, o para inspeccionar DOM, consola, red o rendimiento.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.6k tok
Tamaño del paquete
1 archivo
Última actualización
hace 3 meses
productividad