Skills Agentes

Golang Dependency Injection

Guía completa de inyección de dependencias en Go: por qué importa, inyección manual por constructor y comparación de librerías (google/wire, uber-go/dig, uber-go/fx, samber/do).

Reemplaza a: Variables globales y funciones init() para configurar servicios, Service locators y contenedores pasados como argumento

Solicitaread edit write glob grep bash(go:*) bash(golangci-lint:*) bash(git:*) agent webfetch mcp__context7__resolve-library-id mcp__context7__query-docs askuserquestion
Estrellas
3k

en todo el repo

Actividad
56

0–100, la ruta de este skill

Actualizado
el mes pasado

último commit aquí

Commits
3

últimos 90 días

Contexto
3.2k tok

187 tok en reposo

Paquete
6 archivos

34 KB

Instalar

Funciona con cualquier agente que lea SKILL.md

npx -y skills add samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-dependency-injection --agent claude-code

Se instala solo en este repositorio.

Qué hace

  • Recomienda inyección manual o una librería DI (google/wire, uber-go/dig, uber-go/fx, samber/do) según tabla de decisión
  • Genera código de wiring de dependencias tras evaluar el grafo y ciclo de vida
  • Refactoriza código acoplado usando hasta 3 sub-agentes para detectar globals, tipos concretos y service locators
  • Guía buenas prácticas: inyección por constructor, interfaces en el punto de consumo, container solo en composition root

Úsalo cuando

  • Al diseñar la arquitectura de un servicio nuevo
  • Al configurar inyección de dependencias en un proyecto existente
  • Al refactorizar código fuertemente acoplado
  • Al preguntar sobre inversion of control, service containers o wiring de dependencias en Go

No lo uses cuando

  • Para el uso detallado de una librería DI específica, mejor usar el skill dedicado a esa librería (google-wire, uber-dig, uber-fx o samber-do)

Qué lo activa

Di cualquiera de estas frases y el agente debería cargar este skill.

  • Ayúdame a diseñar la inyección de dependencias de este servicio en Go
  • Refactoriza este código Go para eliminar variables globales y usar DI
  • ¿Qué librería de DI en Go debería usar para mi proyecto?
  • Quiero migrar de un service locator a inyección por constructor

SKILL.md

En inglés

Persona: You are a Go software architect. You guide teams toward testable, loosely coupled designs — you choose the simplest DI approach that solves the problem, and you never over-engineer.

Orchestration mode: Use ultracode when refactoring a large coupled codebase toward dependency injection — orchestrate the three sub-agents described in Refactor mode (global/init discovery, concrete-dependency mapping, service-locator detection) and consolidate into one migration plan.

Modes:

  • Design mode (new project, new service, or adding a service to an existing DI setup): assess the existing dependency graph and lifecycle needs; recommend manual injection or a library from the decision table; then generate the wiring code.
  • Refactor mode (existing coupled code): use up to 3 parallel sub-agents — Agent 1 identifies global variables and init() service setup, Agent 2 maps concrete type dependencies that should become interfaces, Agent 3 locates service-locator anti-patterns (container passed as argument) — then consolidate findings and propose a migration plan.

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill takes precedence.

Dependency Injection in Go

Dependency injection (DI) means passing dependencies to a component rather than having it create or find them. In Go, this is how you build testable, loosely coupled applications — your services declare what they need, and the caller (or container) provides it.

This skill is not exhaustive. When using a DI library (google/wire, uber-go/dig, uber-go/fx, samber/do), refer to the library's official documentation and code examples for current API signatures.

For interface-based design foundations (accept interfaces, return structs), see the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill.

Best Practices Summary

  1. Dependencies MUST be injected via constructors — NEVER use global variables or init() for service setup
  2. Small projects (< 10 services) SHOULD use manual constructor injection — no library needed
  3. Interfaces MUST be defined where consumed, not where implemented — accept interfaces, return structs
  4. NEVER use global registries or package-level service locators
  5. The DI container MUST only exist at the composition root (main() or app startup) — NEVER pass the container as a dependency
  6. Prefer lazy initialization — only create services when first requested
  7. Use singletons for stateful services (DB connections, caches) and transients for stateless ones
  8. Mock at the interface boundary — DI makes this trivial
  9. Keep the dependency graph shallow — deep chains signal design problems
  10. Choose the right DI library for your project size and team — see the decision table below

Why Dependency Injection?

Problem without DI How DI solves it
Functions create their own dependencies Dependencies are injected — swap implementations freely
Testing requires real databases, APIs Pass mock implementations in tests
Changing one component breaks others Loose coupling via interfaces — components don't know each other's internals
Services initialized everywhere Centralized container manages lifecycle (singleton, factory, lazy)
All services loaded at startup Lazy loading — services created only when first requested
Global state and init() functions Explicit wiring at startup — predictable, debuggable

DI shines in applications with many interconnected services — HTTP servers, microservices, CLI tools with plugins. For a small script with 2-3 functions, manual wiring is fine. Don't over-engineer.

Manual Constructor Injection (No Library)

For small projects, pass dependencies through constructors. See Manual DI examples for a complete application example.

// ✓ Good — explicit dependencies, testable
type UserService struct {
    db     UserStore
    mailer Mailer
    logger *slog.Logger
}

func NewUserService(db UserStore, mailer Mailer, logger *slog.Logger) *UserService {
    return &UserService{db: db, mailer: mailer, logger: logger}
}

// main.go — manual wiring
func main() {
    logger := slog.Default()
    db := postgres.NewUserStore(connStr)
    mailer := smtp.NewMailer(smtpAddr)
    userSvc := NewUserService(db, mailer, logger)
    orderSvc := NewOrderService(db, logger)
    api := NewAPI(userSvc, orderSvc, logger)
    api.ListenAndServe(":8080")
}
// ✗ Bad — hardcoded dependencies, untestable
type UserService struct {
    db *sql.DB
}

func NewUserService() *UserService {
    db, _ := sql.Open("postgres", os.Getenv("DATABASE_URL")) // hidden dependency
    return &UserService{db: db}
}

Manual DI breaks down when:

  • You have 15+ services with cross-dependencies
  • You need lifecycle management (health checks, graceful shutdown)
  • You want lazy initialization or scoped containers
  • Wiring order becomes fragile and hard to maintain

DI Library Comparison

Go has three main approaches to DI libraries:

Decision Table

Criteria Manual google/wire uber-go/dig + fx samber/do
Project size Small (< 10 services) Medium-Large Large Any size
Type safety Compile-time Compile-time (codegen) Runtime (reflection) Compile-time (generics)
Code generation None Required (wire_gen.go) None None
Reflection None None Yes None
API style N/A Provider sets + build tags Struct tags + decorators Simple, generic functions
Lazy loading Manual N/A (all eager) Built-in (fx) Built-in
Singletons Manual Built-in Built-in Built-in
Transient/factory Manual Manual Built-in Built-in
Scopes/modules Manual Provider sets Module system (fx) Built-in (hierarchical)
Health checks Manual Manual Manual Built-in interface
Graceful shutdown Manual Manual Built-in (fx) Built-in interface
Container cloning N/A N/A N/A Built-in
Debugging Print statements Compile errors fx.Visualize() ExplainInjector(), web interface
Go version Any Any Any 1.18+ (generics)
Learning curve None Medium High Low

Quick Comparison: Same App, Four Ways

The dependency graph: Config -> Database -> UserStore -> UserService -> API

Manual:

cfg := NewConfig()
db := NewDatabase(cfg)
store := NewUserStore(db)
svc := NewUserService(store)
api := NewAPI(svc)
api.Run()
// No automatic shutdown, health checks, or lazy loading

google/wire:

// wire.go — then run: wire ./...
func InitializeAPI() (*API, error) {
    wire.Build(NewConfig, NewDatabase, NewUserStore, NewUserService, NewAPI)
    return nil, nil
}
// No lifecycle hooks (OnStart/OnStop) or health checks; cleanup via returned func() from providers

uber-go/fx:

app := fx.New(
    fx.Provide(NewConfig, NewDatabase, NewUserStore, NewUserService),
    fx.Invoke(func(api *API) { api.Run() }),
)
app.Run() // manages lifecycle, but reflection-based

samber/do:

i := do.New()
do.Provide(i, NewConfig)
do.Provide(i, NewDatabase)    // auto shutdown + health check
do.Provide(i, NewUserStore)
do.Provide(i, NewUserService)
api := do.MustInvoke[*API](i)
api.Run()
// defer i.Shutdown() — handles all cleanup automatically

Testing with DI

DI makes testing straightforward — inject mocks instead of real implementations:

// Define a mock
type MockUserStore struct {
    users map[string]*User
}

func (m *MockUserStore) FindByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error) {
    u, ok := m.users[id]
    if !ok {
        return nil, ErrNotFound
    }
    return u, nil
}

// Test with manual injection
func TestUserService_GetUser(t *testing.T) {
    mock := &MockUserStore{
        users: map[string]*User{"1": {ID: "1", Name: "Alice"}},
    }
    svc := NewUserService(mock, nil, slog.Default())

    user, err := svc.GetUser(context.Background(), "1")
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
    }
    if user.Name != "Alice" {
        t.Errorf("got %q, want %q", user.Name, "Alice")
    }
}

Testing with samber/do — Clone and Override

Container cloning creates an isolated copy where you override only the services you need to mock:

func TestUserService_WithDo(t *testing.T) {
    // Create a test injector with mock implementation
    testInjector := do.New()

    // Provide the mock UserStore interface
    do.OverrideValue[UserStore](testInjector, &MockUserStore{
        users: map[string]*User{"1": {ID: "1", Name: "Alice"}},
    })

    // Provide other real services as needed
    do.Provide[*slog.Logger](testInjector, func(i *do.Injector) (*slog.Logger, error) {
        return slog.Default(), nil
    })

    svc := do.MustInvoke[*UserService](testInjector)
    user, err := svc.GetUser(context.Background(), "1")
    // ... assertions
}

This is particularly useful for integration tests where you want most services to be real but need to mock a specific boundary (database, external API, mailer).

When to Adopt a DI Library

Signal Action
< 10 services, simple dependencies Stay with manual constructor injection
10-20 services, some cross-cutting concerns Consider a DI library
20+ services, lifecycle management needed Strongly recommended
Need health checks, graceful shutdown Use a library with built-in lifecycle support
Team unfamiliar with DI concepts Start manual, migrate incrementally

Common Mistakes

Mistake Fix
Global variables as dependencies Pass through constructors or DI container
init() for service setup Explicit initialization in main() or container
Depending on concrete types Accept interfaces at consumption boundaries
Passing the container everywhere (service locator) Inject specific dependencies, not the container
Deep dependency chains (A->B->C->D->E) Flatten — most services should depend on repositories and config directly
Creating a new container per request One container per application; use scopes for request-level isolation

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-do skill for detailed samber/do usage patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for interface design and composition
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for testing with dependency injection
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-project-layout skill for DI initialization placement

References

Reproducido de samber/cc-skills-golang bajo licencia MIT. Leer esta página en markdown.

Archivos

6 archivos en el paquete. Solo se lee SKILL.md al activarse — las referencias se cargan si el skill decide que las necesita.

Antes de instalar

Requiere el binario go y aplica a proyectos escritos en Golang.

Detalles

Creador
samber
Licencia
MIT
Recursos incluidos
referencias
Código fuente
Ver SKILL.md

Etiquetas

Más de samber/cc-skills-golang

Este repo incluye 46 skills. Si instalas uno, normalmente ya tienes los demás.

Buenas prácticas de linting y configuración de golangci-lint para proyectos Golang: ejecutar linters, configurar .golangci.yml, suprimir avisos con nolint, interpretar salidas y elegir linters.

Costo de contexto al activarse
1.8k tok
Tamaño del paquete
5 archivos
Última actualización
hace 3 días
herramientas desarrollo

Orquestador de skills de Golang, siempre activo en cualquier tarea de código, revisión, debug o setup: carga las skills más relevantes de samber/cc-skills-golang, a menudo varias a la vez.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.8k tok
Tamaño del paquete
4 archivos
Última actualización
hace 20 días
herramientas desarrollo

Benchmarking, profiling y medición de rendimiento en Golang: escribir y comparar benchmarks, perfilar con pprof, analizar con benchstat y detectar regresiones en CI.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.3k tok
Tamaño del paquete
10 archivos
Última actualización
hace 28 días
testing qa

Patrones y metodología de optimización de rendimiento en Golang: si hay cuello de botella X, aplica el patrón Y, una vez que profiling o benchmarks ya lo identificaron.

Costo de contexto al activarse
2.3k tok
Tamaño del paquete
9 archivos
Última actualización
el mes pasado
herramientas desarrollo

Tests de Golang listos para producción: table-driven, suites y mocks con testify, tests paralelos, fuzzing, fixtures, detección de fugas de goroutines con goleak, snapshot testing, cobertura, tests de integración.

Costo de contexto al activarse
4.4k tok
Tamaño del paquete
6 archivos
Última actualización
el mes pasado
testing qa

Depura programas Go de forma sistemática hasta encontrar y corregir la causa raíz: metodología de debugging, errores comunes de Go, pprof, Delve, detección de races y depuración en producción.

Costo de contexto al activarse
3.2k tok
Tamaño del paquete
12 archivos
Última actualización
el mes pasado
testing qa